Tuesday, April 28, 2009

An (unofficial) explanation for the Flannel/NOOMA anonymity

I apologize for not sharing these tweets before, but I don't visit my Twitter account as regularly as I visit some of my other accounts.

@empoprises just read ur blog postings about Flannel and NOOMA. i do not speak for the org, but our reticence to name names is no accident

@empoprises when you say "an attempt to focus on Jesus Christ rather than the messengers" ... that's why

For context, you may want to visit my earlier post, More traditional evangelism, and anonymity (Flannel/NOOMA).
blog comments powered by Disqus